PerplexityOpen weights model0.6B parameters

Perplexity PII Tracer benchmarks

All models
  • General rank
    Too few tasks4 non-coding tasks ranked5 needed for a rank
  • Cost
    Self-hostedSmall GPU, ~2.9 GBNo hosted price
  • Business#1 / 46 tied
    2.1%Best task · PII left invs PII detectors

Comparison summary

Strongest
Safety and guardrails
Leads 2 of 4 (50%)

An entity tagger: it marks spans of text such as names, addresses or account numbers, used to find personal data and mask it. Strong at safety.

Specifications

Lab
Perplexity
Weights
Open weights
Parameters
0.6B
Licence
MIT
Type
encoder-NER

Safety and guardrails

Share of tasks led · #2 of 46

  1. Gemma 4 31BLeads 3 of 4
  2. Perplexity PII Tracer
    Leads 2 of 4
  3. Amazon ComprehendLeads 1 of 4
  4. Qwen3.8 27BLeads 1 of 5
  5. Gemma 4 12BLeads 0 of 4
  6. Ministral 3 14BLeads 0 of 5
  7. Gemma 4 26B A4BLeads 0 of 4
  8. GLiNER Multi PII v1Leads 0 of 4
See the 5 tasks

Traces

Tier 4 of 19#8 / 46

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Amazon Comprehend10.6, interval 9.4 to 11.9, ahead alone
  2. GLiNER Multi PII v115.3, interval 13.2 to 17.3, tier 2
  3. NVIDIA GLiNER PII19.7, interval 17.4 to 22.0, tier 3
  4. Gemma 4 26B A4B19.8, interval 15.8 to 24.2, tier 3
  5. Qwen3.8 27B20.3, interval 16.5 to 24.3, tier 3
  6. GLiNER2 Large20.4, interval 18.0 to 22.8, tier 3
  7. Gemma 4 12B23.3, interval 19.0 to 27.6, tier 3
  8. Perplexity PII Tracer
    29.8, interval 24.2 to 35.6, tier 4

Business

Tied for the lead#1 / 46

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Perplexity PII Tracer
    2.1, interval 1.2 to 3.0, tied for the lead
  2. Qwen3.8 27B2.4, interval 1.7 to 3.3, tied for the lead
  3. Gemma 4 31B2.9, interval 1.9 to 4.0, tied for the lead
  4. GLiNER Multi PII v14.1, interval 3.1 to 5.3, tier 2
  5. Ministral 3 14B5.4, interval 4.0 to 6.9, tier 2
  6. Gemma 4 12B5.8, interval 4.4 to 7.3, tier 3
  7. Amazon Comprehend5.9, interval 4.6 to 7.2, tier 3
  8. Gemma 4 26B A4B6.9, interval 5.3 to 8.5, tier 3

Multilingual

Ahead alone#1 / 43

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Perplexity PII Tracer
    2.9, interval 2.5 to 3.4, ahead alone
  2. Qwen3.8 27B4.2, interval 3.7 to 4.8, tier 2
  3. Gemma 4 31B4.5, interval 3.9 to 5.1, tier 2
  4. GLiNER Multi PII v15.7, interval 5.2 to 6.3, tier 3
  5. bardsai EU PII Multilang6.9, interval 6.3 to 7.5, tier 4
  6. Qwen3.6 35B A3B7.7, interval 7.0 to 8.4, tier 4
  7. Gemma 4 12B8.9, interval 8.1 to 9.7, tier 5
  8. Ministral 3 14B8.9, interval 8.1 to 9.7, tier 5

Look-alikes

Tier 6 of 7#8 / 9

Look-alikes redacted, % · Lower is better

  1. Gemma 4 31B3.5, interval 2.1 to 5.1, ahead alone
  2. Qwen3.8 27B10.3, interval 7.9 to 12.9, tier 2
  3. NuExtract 319.8, interval 15.9 to 23.6, tier 3
  4. Qwen3.5 9B20.5, interval 16.8 to 24.3, tier 3
  5. Ministral 3 14B30.5, interval 26.5 to 34.8, tier 4
  6. NVIDIA GLiNER PII42.0, interval 38.2 to 46.1, tier 5
  7. Gemma 3 4B IT45.0, interval 41.0 to 49.0, tier 5
  8. Perplexity PII Tracer
    67.6, interval 63.7 to 71.6, tier 6

LangWatch policy

Not ranked

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Gemma 4 31B6.9, interval 2.8 to 11.3, ahead alone
  2. Ministral 3 14B10.2, interval 5.8 to 15.4, tier 2
  3. Gemma 4 12B16.5, interval 10.3 to 23.2, tier 3
  4. Qwen3.8 27B16.7, interval 9.8 to 25.0, tier 3
  5. Gemma 4 26B A4B20.5, interval 13.3 to 28.8, tier 4
  6. Qwen3.5 9B21.5, interval 13.4 to 30.6, tier 4
  7. Gemma 3 4B IT22.4, interval 14.3 to 32.1, tier 4
  8. Perplexity PII Tracer
    57.7, interval 50.7 to 65.2, not ranked

Cost

Self-hosted · GPU memory needed, among encoder-NERs · lower is better

How we count

A model leads a task when it is in the task's leading tie tier. Each task counts inside its own benchmark, against that benchmark's models; no score is averaged. An area chart shows the models ranked on at least 2 of the area's tasks in a benchmark this model is in too. The overall standing counts every non-coding tasks and needs 5 for a rank. Latency is compared only on one hardware tier.

Perplexity PII TracerOther modelsWhisker: 95% interval