Not recordedOpen weights model

secretlint benchmarks

All models
  • General rank
    Too few tasks4 non-coding tasks ranked5 needed for a rank
  • Cost
    Self-hostedHardware not recordedNo hosted price
  • LangWatch policy#30 / 42 tied
    97.4%Best task · PII left invs PII detectors

Comparison summary

Strongest
Safety and guardrails
Leads 0 of 4 (0%)

A secret scanner: it searches text and code for keys, tokens and passwords, used to keep them out of logs and repositories. Strongest at safety.

Specifications

Lab
Not recorded
Weights
Open weights
Parameters
Not disclosed
Licence
MIT
Type
secret scanner

Safety and guardrails

Share of tasks led · #46 of 46

  1. Gemma 4 31BLeads 3 of 4
  2. Perplexity PII TracerLeads 2 of 4
  3. Amazon ComprehendLeads 1 of 4
  4. Qwen3.8 27BLeads 1 of 5
  5. Gemma 4 12BLeads 0 of 4
  6. Ministral 3 14BLeads 0 of 5
  7. Gemma 4 26B A4BLeads 0 of 4
  8. secretlint
    Leads 0 of 4
See the 5 tasks

Traces

Tier 18 of 19#43 / 46

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Amazon Comprehend10.6, interval 9.4 to 11.9, ahead alone
  2. GLiNER Multi PII v115.3, interval 13.2 to 17.3, tier 2
  3. NVIDIA GLiNER PII19.7, interval 17.4 to 22.0, tier 3
  4. Gemma 4 26B A4B19.8, interval 15.8 to 24.2, tier 3
  5. Qwen3.8 27B20.3, interval 16.5 to 24.3, tier 3
  6. GLiNER2 Large20.4, interval 18.0 to 22.8, tier 3
  7. Gemma 4 12B23.3, interval 19.0 to 27.6, tier 3
  8. secretlint
    99.7, interval 99.5 to 99.9, tier 18

Business

Tier 18 of 18#38 / 46

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Perplexity PII Tracer2.1, interval 1.2 to 3.0, tied for the lead
  2. Qwen3.8 27B2.4, interval 1.7 to 3.3, tied for the lead
  3. Gemma 4 31B2.9, interval 1.9 to 4.0, tied for the lead
  4. GLiNER Multi PII v14.1, interval 3.1 to 5.3, tier 2
  5. Ministral 3 14B5.4, interval 4.0 to 6.9, tier 2
  6. Gemma 4 12B5.8, interval 4.4 to 7.3, tier 3
  7. Amazon Comprehend5.9, interval 4.6 to 7.2, tier 3
  8. secretlint
    100.0, interval 100.0 to 100.0, tier 18

Multilingual

Tier 25 of 25#37 / 43

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Perplexity PII Tracer2.9, interval 2.5 to 3.4, ahead alone
  2. Qwen3.8 27B4.2, interval 3.7 to 4.8, tier 2
  3. Gemma 4 31B4.5, interval 3.9 to 5.1, tier 2
  4. GLiNER Multi PII v15.7, interval 5.2 to 6.3, tier 3
  5. bardsai EU PII Multilang6.9, interval 6.3 to 7.5, tier 4
  6. Qwen3.6 35B A3B7.7, interval 7.0 to 8.4, tier 4
  7. Gemma 4 12B8.9, interval 8.1 to 9.7, tier 5
  8. secretlint
    100.0, interval 100.0 to 100.0, tier 25

Look-alikes

Not ranked

Look-alikes redacted, % · Lower is better

  1. secretlint
    0.0, interval 0.0 to 0.0, not ranked
  2. Gemma 4 31B3.5, interval 2.1 to 5.1, ahead alone
  3. Qwen3.8 27B10.3, interval 7.9 to 12.9, tier 2
  4. NuExtract 319.8, interval 15.9 to 23.6, tier 3
  5. Qwen3.5 9B20.5, interval 16.8 to 24.3, tier 3
  6. Ministral 3 14B30.5, interval 26.5 to 34.8, tier 4
  7. NVIDIA GLiNER PII42.0, interval 38.2 to 46.1, tier 5
  8. Gemma 3 4B IT45.0, interval 41.0 to 49.0, tier 5

LangWatch policy

Tier 12 of 13#30 / 42

PII left in, % · Lower is better

  1. Gemma 4 31B6.9, interval 2.8 to 11.3, ahead alone
  2. Ministral 3 14B10.2, interval 5.8 to 15.4, tier 2
  3. Gemma 4 12B16.5, interval 10.3 to 23.2, tier 3
  4. Qwen3.8 27B16.7, interval 9.8 to 25.0, tier 3
  5. Gemma 4 26B A4B20.5, interval 13.3 to 28.8, tier 4
  6. Qwen3.5 9B21.5, interval 13.4 to 30.6, tier 4
  7. Gemma 3 4B IT22.4, interval 14.3 to 32.1, tier 4
  8. secretlint
    97.4, interval 92.6 to 100.0, tier 12
How we count

A model leads a task when it is in the task's leading tie tier. Each task counts inside its own benchmark, against that benchmark's models; no score is averaged. An area chart shows the models ranked on at least 2 of the area's tasks in a benchmark this model is in too. The overall standing counts every non-coding tasks and needs 5 for a rank. Latency is compared only on one hardware tier.

secretlintOther modelsWhisker: 95% interval